One
of the principles of the European Union is peace and stability. However, as a
precondition for accession to the Union, is joining NATO, led by the United
States, which are not exactly known for its peacekeeping operations.
WAR
IN IRAQ
One of the intervention of the
international community was the war in Iraq (2003-2010) .This was a series of
military interventions for the purpose of the occupation of Iraq by the
coalition of 48 country-led US and UK, despite opposition from France, Germany,
Russia and China. the official reason for the war is supposed weapons of mass
destruction held by Saddam Hussein, but at the end this weapon hasn't been
found which leads to the questions: what is really the aim of the United
States? The goal is, as they say many experts, control the rich oil wells. By
2003 there were approximately 9,200 civilian deaths and more than 7,000 Iraqi soldiers .To end of the war the number of victims is significantly increased, but
still do not know the exact number. War was completed in 2010 when 70% of the
population had access to drinking water . Unemployment, according to some
reports, is over 65%. Is this the contribution to peace, democracy and human
rights for which EU in 2012. got Nobel Prize?
DEFINITION
OF NATO
In one of the books that are applied
by us in basic education, in order to blur the eyes of the nation states that
NATO:
"... intergovernmental
organizations, political and military alliance that brings together 28 members
from Europe and North America. Founded in 1949 with headquarters in Brussels
for the construction of a system of collective security and defense. NATO is
the protector of democratic values and achievements of the modern world
..."
 |
|
|
New
explanation abbreviations NATO
|
NATO members have committed
themselves to help another Member State whose security is threatened. Nevertheless,
the pact is abusing its military and political power and violated the
resolutions of the United Nations. The best and most recent example is the
aggression of 1999 on the FRY.
Bombing of Yugoslavia
Although not carried out the attack
on a member of NATO, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was attacked as "guilty
of a humanitarian catastrophe in Kosovo and excessive use of force".
The reason were the failed negotiations in Rambouillet. The conditions of the
international community were unacceptable to any sovereign country is not the
Assembly is not acceepted .Attack is executed without the approval of the UN
Security Council which was precedent. 19 NATO countries on March 24, 1999 at 19:
45, by commands Javier Solana, launching air strikes with cruise missiles and
aircraft.
Some sources close to NATO argue
that the pact considered use of nuclear weapons for fear of losing this war like
the one in Bosnia. The bombing ended on 9 June 1999 after an open threat to FRY
President Slobodan Milosevic that "Belgrade raze" ... Is not NATO
pact that is used excessive military force? Is not he the culprit for the
migration of Serbs from Kosovo, for destruction their homes, to grab the
property of Serbian Orthodox Church and desecration of churches and monasteries? Therefore, NATO is
not very different from the Tripartite Pact fascist countries 1940 who got the
title of the devil's pact. Therefore true equality NATO pact = pact with the
devil.
Bombing
The bombings, which are without
interruption lasted 78 days, killing at least 2,500 people Forces including 89
children, were wounded and injured 12,500 people. Destroyed 25 000 housing
units, 470 km of roads, 595 km of track. Destroyed 60 bridges, destroyed 300
factories, damaged 190 schools and 20 hospitals. 280,000 Serbs have left their
homeland, Kosovo. Has been fired 50,000 missiles, 58,574 flying NATO
aircraft, thrown 25,000 tons of explosives.
Estimated damage of $ 100 billion.
|
||
|
|
Today in Serbia annually from cancer
are diagnosed 40,000 people die around 25 000. From 2001. number of cancer has
increased by 20% and deaths by 25%. Therefore the mortality increased by 12%.
After the war, the Union has
established the ICTY and trying the alleged war criminals
among others Slobodan Milosevic (extradited, seems symbolic, June 28, 2001 on
the basis of pubic order signed by Zoran Djindjic) who, due to deliberate lack of
care, died in the infamous court. This is the EU continued to hold the former
country of Yugoslavia in the chain. Boris Malagurski in his documentary
"The Weight of Chains" explains in detail the interests of the international
community in Yugoslavia, their ugly intentions and their crimes.
European officials have resorted to
the old Roman maxim: "Divide and conquer" They divided people in
Yugoslavia, started the war helping the Ustasha in Croatia, religious fanatics
in Bosnia and Kosovo terrorists.We should ask ourselves whether it is this Europe
whose part we want to be? Could there be a future?
No comments:
Post a Comment